最后更新
2018年12月16日
区块链安全应该有两层:网络安全和治理。虽然重点往往是网络安全(反黑客攻击,代码审查等),但普通用户在日常使用中遇到的冲突/争议往往比安全黑客更常见,使治理变得同样重要,并且覆盖更多区域而不是网络安全。  在没有(或不应该)拥有集中仲裁服务的分散生态系统中更是如此。
目前,一个没有利益冲突的分散,透明和公平的争议解决机制是区块链最重要的缺失部分。
以普通法陪审团制度为蓝本,誓言议定书将现实世界中最可靠的法律制度之一与区块链技术,密码学,计算算法,博弈论信誉系统和其他概念结合起来,提供第2层交叉链基础设施以及支持技术,用于分散,标准和可扩展的公共链不可知协议,以保护dApp用户’权利和资产。
请参阅我们的白皮书( https://oaths.io/files/OATH-Whitepaper-EN.pdf) 和github(
Q3 2018
Q4 2018
Q1 2019
Q2 2019
Q3 2019
Q4 2019
验证 100%
验证 88%
注意。未经证实的成员实际上可能不是团队成员
Strength and Opportunities:
OATH, unlike some competitors, is blockchain agnostic. This means the success of the OATH protocol is not dependent on the success of a particular public blockchain.
OATH is serving a need that arises based on the emergence of the internet of value and blockchain based business relationships. Once smart contracts get more popular dispute resolution inevitably will become necessary. If OATH can build a user-friendly and highly functional product there is a good chance that the market will adopt it given the fact it is one of the first dispute management solutions.
OATH was able to present a number of partnerships with already established blockchain projects. Besides NEM OATH also announced a partnership with QuarkChain, a blockchain with a distinctive approach towards using sharding technology. QuarkChain is currently among the top 150 cryptocurrencies valued by market capitalization. OATH plans to leverage the communities of their partners for recruiting jurors and for leveraging their own community strength.
Weaknesses and Threats:
OATH is not the only protocol focussed on dispute resolution. Kleros is an alternative blockchain based dispute resolution solution. The Kleros team is already for various years in the space and recently got featured on Epicenter.tv episode 250, where they introduced the team and the concept. OATH does not count with significant distinctive features compared to Kleros in the basic dispute resolution model. OATH tries to serve a big number of use cases. While it may compete with Kleros for traditional dispute resolution, it will compete with Augur, when it comes to verify outcomes of oracle services. At the same time it will compete with Aragon for delivering the best public chain governance solution. This represents a broad number of use cases that are very different from each other. It will be hard for OATH to provide a product that can serve all these use cases very well. On the other hand, none of the mentioned competitors has yet achieved a dominant position. Furthermore, OATH may not need to become the best platform in every market that it serves for the purpose of becoming a flourishing dispute resolution protocol.
Verdict:
The idea presented by OATH protocol is very intriguing, since it solves a problem that the algorithms that run behind the smart contracts of public blockchains can’t solve. OATH may not be the first or the only dispute resolution platform, but their team, investors and white paper are compelling
此优惠仅基于要约人提供的信息及其他公开信息。令牌销售或交换活动与ICO持有人完全无关,ICO持有人不参与(包括任何技术支持或促销)。仅显示ICO持有人无关的人员列出的令牌销售仅用于帮助客户跟踪总体令牌部门内发生的活动。这些信息并不意味着相当于您应该依赖的建议。在采取或不采取任何行动之前,您必须获得专业或专家的建议或进行自己的尽职调查。贡献者就收购令牌所订立的任何条款及条件属于其之间,而令牌及ICO持有人的发行人并非该等令牌的卖方。对于任何代币销售而言,ICOholder对第三方所作的任何陈述不承担任何法律责任,并且还必须直接针对此处列出的代币发行实体提出任何违反合同的请求。
如果您有任何疑问关于此令牌销售的性质,合法性或合法性或相关人员,请联系info@icoholder.com,了解有关您的疑虑的详细信息。