Bloom es un ecosistema programable y estandarizado para facilitar el acceso bajo demanda, seguro & nbsp; y global a los servicios de crédito. Bloom presenta un enfoque novedoso para la evaluación del riesgo crediticio que permite a prestamistas tradicionales y prestamistas de activos digitales emitir & nbsp; préstamos compatibles en la cadena de bloques al tiempo que aumenta la competencia para reducir las tarifas y & nbsp; mejorar la experiencia del prestatario en cada capa del proceso de emisión de crédito. </P >
El protocolo Bloom presenta soluciones a los siguientes problemas:
Fase 1: sistema de invitación a la floración y votación
Fase 2: coincidencia de identidad Bloom (BloomID)
Fase 3: Replanteo de créditos (precursor de BloomScore)
Fase 4: Evaluación de la solvencia crediticia (BloomScore)
Fase 5: Lanzamiento del protocolo de crédito Bloom + BloomCard
Fase 6: Infraestructura de Crédito Autónomo Democratizado
Verificado 33%
Atención. Existe el riesgo de que los miembros no verificados no sean realmente miembros del equipo
Opportunities:
The Equifax hack in September 2017, which allowed attackers to obtain crucial personal identity information for 143 million people, shows that a decentralized and secured credit scoring system like the Bloom protocol is much needed.
Bloom is a protocol that other lending platforms can build on top of, meaning that Bloom will be mentioned anytime it is being used by a lending platform. In crypto, news flow is one of the factors that drive liquidity and price so this is important.
The co-founders all have impressive credentials, with Alain and John being in the identity space since 2013.
The white paper is well written and covers ways to prevent exploits of the protocol, for example, users creating a new BloomID after ruining the original one, or users manipulating BloomScore by creating fake BloomIDs to vouch for themselves. This shows that the team has put a lot of thoughts into the technical side of the project and shows the team’s competency.
Concerns:
The team has not developed any proof of concept/beta, so essentially this project is still at the white paper stage.
The project has a high hard cap of $50 million, the majority of which will be used for user acquisition. This makes sense from a business perspective, but in general, the higher the starting market cap for a project, the lower the potential return for ICO participants. Therefore, we believe the attractiveness of the ICO depends on how much funds are raised.
It looks like all the co-founders are working on Bloom on a part-time basis while they are also working on other businesses that they have founded. It is unclear how much time they are able to allocate to Bloom.
There is no estimated completion timeframe for the milestones listed in the roadmap, so we are unsure when the protocol will be completed and ready to roll out.
Conclusion
Overall, we are neutral about this ICO for its short-term potential and like its long-term potential if it raises less than $30 million from the ICO. Our thoughts of the tokens for short term and long term are as follows:
For short-term holding
Neutral. Hard cap of $50 million is very high, especially for a white paper project. We are not sure if the project can reach the hard cap, so there may not be unmet demand for the ICO.
For long-term holding
Depends. We believe the project can provide attractive long-term return if the project raises less than $30 million, otherwise we are neutral. Even though the team is impressive and they have a well-thought-out plan, the project is at a white paper stage and it probably takes a long time for the protocol to launch.
The ambitious hard cap of $50 million is also on the steep side. While the project idea of decentralized credit scoring and lending platform is ostensibly great, the team has impeccable credentials and the white paper is thorough although, there is a lack of proof of concept.
The team is also seemingly working part-time on the project seeing that there is an unclear timeframe for the roadmap.
Esta oferta se basa en información proporcionada únicamente por el oferente y otra información públicamente disponible. El evento de venta o intercambio de fichas no tiene relación alguna con ICOholder e ICOholder no participa en él (incluido cualquier soporte técnico o promoción). Las ventas de tokens enumeradas de personas con las que ICOholder no tiene relación se muestran solo para ayudar a los clientes a realizar un seguimiento de la actividad que tiene lugar dentro del sector token general. Esta información no pretende constituir un asesoramiento en el que debe confiar. Debe obtener asesoramiento profesional o especializado o llevar a cabo su propia diligencia debida antes de tomar, o abstenerse de, cualquier acción en función del contenido de nuestro sitio. Los términos y condiciones que ingresen los contribuyentes con respecto a la adquisición de Tokens se encuentran entre ellos y el emisor del Token y ICOholder no es el vendedor de dichos Tokens. ICOholder no tiene ninguna responsabilidad legal por las declaraciones realizadas por terceros con respecto a cualquier venta de Token y cualquier reclamo por incumplimiento de contrato también debe realizarse directamente contra la entidad emisora del Token que se detalla en este documento.
Si tiene alguna inquietud acerca de la naturaleza, propiedad o legalidad de esta venta de tokens o de las personas involucradas en ella, póngase en contacto con info@icoholder.com . con información detallada sobre sus inquietudes.