Bloom是一个标准化,可编程的生态系统,以便按需,安全和全球获得信贷服务。布卢姆提出了一种新颖的信贷风险评估方法,允许传统的法定贷款人和数字资产贷款人在区块链上发行符合规定的贷款,同时增加竞争以降低费用,并改善信贷发行过程中每一层的借款人经验。</p > Bloom协议提出了以下问题的解决方案:
第一阶段:盛大邀请系统和投票
阶段2:Bloom身份匹配(BloomID)
阶段3:信贷投放(BloomScore的前身)
阶段4:信用评估(BloomScore)
阶段5:Bloom信用协议启动+ BloomCard
阶段6:民主化的自治信贷基础设施
验证 33%
注意。未经证实的成员实际上可能不是团队成员
Opportunities:
The Equifax hack in September 2017, which allowed attackers to obtain crucial personal identity information for 143 million people, shows that a decentralized and secured credit scoring system like the Bloom protocol is much needed.
Bloom is a protocol that other lending platforms can build on top of, meaning that Bloom will be mentioned anytime it is being used by a lending platform. In crypto, news flow is one of the factors that drive liquidity and price so this is important.
The co-founders all have impressive credentials, with Alain and John being in the identity space since 2013.
The white paper is well written and covers ways to prevent exploits of the protocol, for example, users creating a new BloomID after ruining the original one, or users manipulating BloomScore by creating fake BloomIDs to vouch for themselves. This shows that the team has put a lot of thoughts into the technical side of the project and shows the team’s competency.
Concerns:
The team has not developed any proof of concept/beta, so essentially this project is still at the white paper stage.
The project has a high hard cap of $50 million, the majority of which will be used for user acquisition. This makes sense from a business perspective, but in general, the higher the starting market cap for a project, the lower the potential return for ICO participants. Therefore, we believe the attractiveness of the ICO depends on how much funds are raised.
It looks like all the co-founders are working on Bloom on a part-time basis while they are also working on other businesses that they have founded. It is unclear how much time they are able to allocate to Bloom.
There is no estimated completion timeframe for the milestones listed in the roadmap, so we are unsure when the protocol will be completed and ready to roll out.
Conclusion
Overall, we are neutral about this ICO for its short-term potential and like its long-term potential if it raises less than $30 million from the ICO. Our thoughts of the tokens for short term and long term are as follows:
For short-term holding
Neutral. Hard cap of $50 million is very high, especially for a white paper project. We are not sure if the project can reach the hard cap, so there may not be unmet demand for the ICO.
For long-term holding
Depends. We believe the project can provide attractive long-term return if the project raises less than $30 million, otherwise we are neutral. Even though the team is impressive and they have a well-thought-out plan, the project is at a white paper stage and it probably takes a long time for the protocol to launch.
The ambitious hard cap of $50 million is also on the steep side. While the project idea of decentralized credit scoring and lending platform is ostensibly great, the team has impeccable credentials and the white paper is thorough although, there is a lack of proof of concept.
The team is also seemingly working part-time on the project seeing that there is an unclear timeframe for the roadmap.
此优惠仅基于要约人提供的信息及其他公开信息。令牌销售或交换活动与ICO持有人完全无关,ICO持有人不参与(包括任何技术支持或促销)。仅显示ICO持有人无关的人员列出的令牌销售仅用于帮助客户跟踪总体令牌部门内发生的活动。这些信息并不意味着相当于您应该依赖的建议。在采取或不采取任何行动之前,您必须获得专业或专家的建议或进行自己的尽职调查。贡献者就收购令牌所订立的任何条款及条件属于其之间,而令牌及ICO持有人的发行人并非该等令牌的卖方。对于任何代币销售而言,ICOholder对第三方所作的任何陈述不承担任何法律责任,并且还必须直接针对此处列出的代币发行实体提出任何违反合同的请求。
如果您有任何疑问关于此令牌销售的性质,合法性或合法性或相关人员,请联系info@icoholder.com,了解有关您的疑虑的详细信息。