JURA

JURA

Created using Figma
Created using Figma
分散生态系统的未来
Token Sale
To be announced
额外细节
平台
Ethereum
KYC
分类
平台

关于 JURA

在过去几年中见证了分散式应用的快速发展,JURA NETWORK的愿景是构建下一代区块链技术。在恶意网络活动面前,对可扩展性,最终性和可靠性的强大分散网络的要求很高。尽管近年来已经提出并改进了过多的网络,但目前的每秒事务处理(TPS),网络安全性和可扩展性的不足仍然有很大的改进空间。

考虑到这些因素,JURA团队在本文中详细介绍了由JURA NETWORK设计的JURA技术。它包括Fusus,作为分布式账本的基础的DAGlattice数据结构,在分散网络中自我调节的效用证明(PoU)共识机制,可验证随机时间(PoVRT)模块的反垃圾邮件证明,用于可伸缩性设计的分片技术,以及作为安全层的AI过滤器。 JURA团队认为,JURA将为广泛部署分散式应用铺平道路,并为当前的市场格局开辟新的改进途径。

特征

真正分散并准备好采用业务。

- 超快

- 费用

- 自主

- 智能合约

技术信息

我们技术的核心是FUSUS数据结构:基于个人帐户的DAG格式,它以不同方式优先发送和接收事务,其中每个发送事务导致将先前接收事务重新划分为单个新的创建块。这使我们能够通过定期修剪事务历史来大大提高数据查找速度和存储空间。与我们的PoVRT反垃圾邮件模块相结合,FUSUS使我们能够在效率,速度和垃圾邮件检测之间实现完美平衡。

公用事业共识机制证明。 公平分配投票权的新的,多维度,不断发展的共识机制
  • - 赌注效用的高级系统视图 
  • - 用于推断可信度的时间增加指标 
  • - 无参数,无分布的概率模型 
  • - 实现自我监管的广义共识机制 
  • - 可定制以满足不同行业的需求 
DMDS。  动态监控分布式分片
  • - P2P网络节点分区 
  • - 优化速度和安全性的多层设计 
  • - 并行处理以实现极高的可扩展性 
  • - 进一步增强系统安全性的紧急备份解决方案

 

%name%Roadmap

  • 2018

  • Whitepaper release
    Design prototype of key components
    ERC-20 token generation
    PoU based consensus framework and FUSUS
    Sharding architeture integration
    Testnet launch
  • 2019

  • Embed data storage and data persistent framwork
    Smart contract implementation
    Virtual machine beta
    Mainnet launch

活动

关注:
6 783
HIGH
推文:
434
HIGH
30天成长:
-3
会员:
14 311
VERY HIGH
30天成长:
-3881
Alexa的

秩:
3 366 154
VERY LOW
三角洲:
432 466

JURA 球队

验证 0%

注意。未经证实的成员实际上可能不是团队成员

Iris Yang
B.S. in Applied Math, Columbia University
未验证
Cameron Wang
Ph.D. in Math, Princeton University
未验证
Alex Dang
Ph.D in Biomedical Engineering, Columbia Universit...
未验证
Xiang Ma
M.S. in Computer Science, Columbia University
未验证
Seter Kwok
B.S. in Computer Science, Peking University
未验证
Jonathan Hsu
Ph.D in Computer Science
未验证
Raheel Ahmad
B.S. in Business & Marketing, NewYork University S...
未验证
Yichen Gong
B.S. in Computer Science, NewYork University
未验证
Allen Wang
B.E. in material Tianjin University of Technology
未验证
Zachary Chen
B.S. in Computer Science, Peking University
未验证
Dream Wu
M.S. in Software & Engineering, Beijing University...
未验证

顾问

验证 0%

注意。未经证实的成员实际上可能不是团队成员

Siddhartha Dalal
Advisor
未验证
Sam Park
Advisor
未验证
Arun Sundararajan
Advisor
未验证
David Anthony Gulley
Advisor
未验证
Simon Littlewood
Advisor
未验证
Tian Jia
Advisor
未验证

JURA 最新消息

4.41
positive
5.0 18
ICO 轮廓 视力 活动 潜在 产品 球队

%name%Reviews

Ian Balina

13-July. I passed on Jura. I think it was something to do with the team. Link

阅读更多
Coin Bloq
阅读更多
Crypto Calibur
78

We view Jura as a novel approach to the ever-growing space of infrastructure projects, hence having the potential to disrupt the market and gain a lot of usage. There is a big IF in this equation as the team has yet to prove themselves and bring forward actual progress which can validate their theories and novel technologies. There is a long road ahead and we would like to see an MVP so that the team can prove their network model and seize a place in the competitive field they are running in. They need to act fast as there are already many competitors that have working viable technologies and can bring added value to the ecosystem in the meantime.

阅读更多
MMCrypto
4/7
阅读更多
PicoloResearch

Picolo Research presents an ‘Avoid’ rating on Jura Network. The project does not offer a unique niche that differentiates itself distinctly from other similar projects, crowning it is as yet another typical blockchain infrastructure project. Furthermore, gaining a foothold in adoption is a critical element in this competitive market, of which the project mentioned no specific business plans.
Overall, for the reasons listed below, Picolo affirms its rating on Jura:
• The project is late in entering this space, which ranks it as a lagger amongs its competitors
• No significant partnerships formed that is crucial to network adoption in this highly saturated market
• It has been more than 9 months since the inception of the project with no MVP nor GitHub code available, casting doubt on the ability to achieve their milestones
• The team is lacking the depth regarding experience in comparison to its competitors
• No public information on technology and cryptography research thesis done by the PhD members of the team prior to the project
• Currently, there is only 1 member on the advisory board with no independent advisors
• Lack of conclusiveness in the whitepaper as details are incomplete. The consensus mechanism was only partially described, and the portion to penalise dishonest behaviours have not been discussed
• High valuation of $100m is not justifiable comparative to the market cap of QLC chain (with an MVP) that currently has a market valuation of ~$18m
• More established projects have been looking to explore similar technology since 2017, but no breakthrough has yet to been developed 
Not withstanding the above, Picolo acknowledges that Jura is still in its early stages and that further developments are still underway. However, given the
availability of current information presented by the company, it is difficult to disregard the concerns that have surfaced from our research.
In light of the preceding, we recommend an ‘Avoid’ rating on Jura as we believe there are significant risks associated with the project.

阅读更多
查看全部(%count%)
  • 由于信息更新可能存在时间差异,因此应通过其官方网站或其他沟通渠道验证有关每个ICO项目的准确信息。
  • 这些信息不是投资ICO资金的建议或建议。请自行彻底调查相关信息并决定ICO的参与情况。
  • 如果您认为有任何问题需要纠正,或者您想提交自己的ICO项目,请给我们发送电子邮件。
请阅读免责声明和风险警告。 显示免责声明和风险警告。
Planning an ICO? We can help with a wide range of support for all stages of your ICO