Dernière mise à jour
20 sept. 2018
Celes Chain est une chaîne publique innovante reposant sur des applications / services financiers et offrant un accès aux régulateurs et aux décideurs. Les régulateurs sont des "super administrateurs" sur la chaîne et régulent Celes Chain et leurs applications dans toutes les dimensions. De plus, Celes Chain réduit les coûts et améliore l'efficacité de la réglementation. Par conséquent, il reconstruit la concurrence du marché et la confiance des institutions.
Le langage de script intelligent Celes Chain, CSSL, est utilisé pour développer la logique commerciale de CC, & nbsp; y compris des services tels que le code, les applications, les contrats intelligents et les règlements. & nbsp; Les fonctionnalités - y compris Turing complète, évaluation de la consommation, exécution automatique, compatibilité avec les réglementations, utilisation facile, protection de la vie privée, etc., etc. & ndash; soutient notre objectif ultime: & ldquo; Code is law law & rdquo;. & nbsp; Celes Chain dispose du compilateur spécialement conçu pour traduire les logiques d’entreprise en documents juridiques. Nous définissons les régulateurs comme des utilisateurs spéciaux avec un accès maximal à tous les niveaux, toutes les données et les informations des utilisateurs tout au long de la chaîne Celes.
1.3.2 Regulators Uses Celes Chain: Less Cost and be More
Effective to Prevent the next Potential Financial Crises
In order to prevent the next financial crisis, the regulators, including the central banks, securities agencies or other financial regulators, are using a remedialmeasure: first of all, they try to repair the existing compliance systems and thenupgrade the IT technology. Finally they try to improve the whole system. Althoughthis approach is easy to get started, there are also huge drawbacks:
(1) Huge amount of data to be processed: This includes the amount and timing which the industry needs to submit through their old systems. Also regulators need to have a new system ready to process such big amount of the data. It would be a huge challenge to the bank's IT system.
(2) Legal Documents and Regulatory Costs: Every single bill has a vast of documents with high enforcement costs.
(3) Social costs can be as high as hundreds of billions of dollars and tens of millions of working hours. In addition to the social costs, it can also cost the government billions of dollars. And such project usually is a progressive development, and it is difficult to predict the total cost.
(4) It could take years for the implementations even if the financial institutions are
willing to cooperate.
First of all, our Celes Chain is a public-chain blockchain system that uses innovative consensus. The data generated by those financial applications built on our system, are not able to be falsified. They are also transparent and visible to regulatory compliance and analysis. It easily solves the first problem above.
Second, all the laws, regulations, and smart contracts are stored in Celes Chain in the form of codes and executed automatically by the Celes Virtual Machine (CVM), effectively solving the second problem above.
Like the other financial institutions, government regulators conduct their financial activities by participating in regulation activities on Celes Chain and pay a certain amount of token to miners. Since the miner operations are fully decentralized and competitive, the regulatory costs will be significantly lower than the regulatory costs currently required.
In theory, any regulation implemented on Celes Chain is considered to be "real-time". Regulators can also do a variety of "stress tests" if needed. By using a common platform, financial institutions will be much faster than traditional way when they try to adopt to new regulations. Although regulation at Celes Chain can save hundreds of billions of dollars in costs and is highly efficient, regulators do not need to force financial institutions to use the platform through additional laws and regulations. The only thing the regulators need is to be compatible with this Celes Chain, and financial institutions will voluntarily choose to use Celes Chain because of cost and efficiency considerations. In addition, because Celes Chain is a public chain, this reduces the doubts of financial institutions when considering to participate the chain.
1.3.3 Financial Institutions Uses Celes Chain: Cost Saving and Return Increasing
There are many reasons why financial institutions should choose Celes Chain, but only this one is the most important: to increase shareholder return. Financial institutions can increase shareholder return in the following ways.
(1) Reduce the costs of regulation, compliance and arbitration: The theoretical costs for financial institutions to respond to various types of regulation at Celes10
Chain can be almost zero. In the most extreme circumstances, some financial institutions might have their profit before tax increased by 30% [32]. Moreover, as regulatory compliance becomes more transparent and contracts are written and stored on Celes Chain, this will significantly reduce the costs of arbitration due to disagreement.
(2) Reduce the operation cost from the back office : the use of smart contracts can greatly reduce operational risk. Because smart contracts are automatically executed by virtual machines and settled.
(3) Reduce possible losses: The use of blockchain / public chain can be more effective in managing counterparty risk.
(4) Generates more profits: financial institutions can access a larger market more easily and quickly to develop valuable products.
1.3.4 Final Users of Celes Chain Could Have a Safe and Effective Service
Users use financial services through Celes Chain for better pricing and security. As financial institutions can produce financial products with lower costs. At the same time, the users can enjoy lower prices and higher quality of service.End-users can easily identify whether the purchased product is in compliance with regulation; with a proper risk disclosure and safe.
Un algorithme de consensus innovant, DPoW (preuve de travail déléguée)
DPoW combine PoW (preuve de travail) et PoB (preuve de brûlure):
On utilise PoW, une preuve de travail plus lente générer du bois à brûler. La PoB était ensuite utilisée pour accélérer l’incinération et était excavée en brûlant le bois en bonus et en produisant les blocs.
Si Celes Chain devient précieux, la puissance de hachage externe peut être indirectement récompensée via PoW, ce qui démontre la vraie décentralisation. Le PoB peut être utilisé pour produire des jetons et générer des blocs à plus grande vitesse qui sont plus efficaces pour les applications à grande échelle.
2018.8: Complete DPOW consensus
2018 Q1: White Paper Draft
2018.5: White Paper Release
2018.5: Identify the development framework
2018.8: Complete DPOW consensus
2018.9: Smart Contract 1.0 online
2018 Q4: Test network online
2019 Q1: Main network boot
Vérifié 9%
Attention. Il y a un risque que les membres non vérifiés ne soient pas réellement membres de l'équipe
Strength and Opportunities:
Among the investors of Celes Chain are recognized venture capital firms in the cryptocurrency space. Fenbushi Capital, who is an investor and partner of NEO is one of them. Other investors are Starwin Capital, Block VC, Northern Light, and PreAngel.
Weaknesses and Threats:
The consensus mechanism used by Celes has so far not been sufficiently tested. As long as a new consensus mechanism has not been extensively analyzed by academic professionals, tested under real world circumstances and been functional without any complications for several months a new consensus mechanism should be considered as risky. These uncertainties around the design of the blockchain will make it hard to gain adoption by users, investors and enterprises. It will be very difficult for a relatively new blockchain like Celes to obtain the interest of regulatory agencies. Why should regulatory agencies work together with the Celes Chain, when they have not yet reached final conclusions about the validity of significantly larger public blockchains such as Ethereum?
Verdict:
The Celes Chain white paper is not clear why the global financial regulatory institutions should use the Celes Chain for conducting their financial supervisory activities. Realistically the contrarian scenario which implies that this adoption by regulatory agency will not happen, must be considered as the much likelier one. The public sector and in particular regulatory agencies will be among the last adopters of blockchain technology. Private enterprises and consumers will most likely adopt this technology much earlier. Without this adoption the potential use cases of the Celes Chain are very restricted. Celes Chain has influential private investors, but ICO participants need to ask themself if this is enough for a successful ICO and later on a positive development of the token.
