ViMarket及其零售业的中断 营销！ ViMarket英国有限公司的形成作为一项专业服务 公司，是高科技探索的结果 3D内容创作的进步，虚拟，增强现实， 人工智能和机器学习。 ViMarket可视化 人类的购买决定和愿望，通过改变 传统的2D零售浏览体验融入身临其境的VR，通过 我们的车站和公民建设者工具。我们对未来的洞察力 我们的世界消费者的零售愿望，最大限度的参与和 暴露给商家赞助商，同时虚拟愿望清单 攻击购物车抛弃日益严峻的挑战， 每年损失6.4万亿美元。
$327 525 370
$22 500 000
This is a propriety technology that enables the community of citizens to create their own lives virtually through the purchase of virtual 3D assets.
PROS:1. Technology oriented as it utilizes new technology through the creation of immersiveexperiences2. Allows the users to create and share virtual reality(VR) experience using any device that isconnected to internet hence easy to use3. The Ethereum based VI Token enables the consumers to acquire virtual goods and services fromVI market4. The ecosystem created enables the customers to visualize their lives and aspirations5. High professional team6. Detailed whitepaper
CONS:1. Lack of proper contact between the merchants and the customers2. The promotional channels missing3. The VI Token exchange with other crypto currencies is not well elaborated
SUGGESTIONS:1. Allow for the exchange of the crypto currencies with other local currencies to encourage eventhe local citizens2. The users contact is minimal. Create an easy channel where the users can easily access theavailable goods3. Clearly highlight the promotional channels of the goods and services to fasten the customersdecision making
NOTE:The technological advancement aided by ICO has led in the prosperity of different project through theuse of the crypto currencies. I would like to invest in this project as it is backed up by ICO gearedtowards easening the way citizens can acquire beneficial assets at a reduced cost
High-level competition on the market by leading technology companies - despite the fact that there are no ViMarket analogues yet, the market players have all the resources for replicating such business model, if its market acceptance will be fully confirmed. It should be noted that there are a lot of strong players in each target segment of ViMarket: Houzz in interior design, mark.space and inVRsion in e-commerce. Currently, there are no confirmed agreements with potential clients.
Most solutions are only conceptually developed, i.e. there is no MVP. To the number of functioning, services can be attributed only ViMarket editor. The concept of the product is rather unintuitive, there is a need to work on integrating the service into the existing Internet space in order to make the transition to the platform logical for the user. The product development roadmap is devoid of useful information and noted timelines are stretched over a long period of time. There's no competitive landscape analysis in WP. There is a risk that it will not be possible to establish relations with corporate clients, who by their presence on the platform create the bulk of the value of the service. Use of blockchain technology doesn't have any positive impact on operational and economic components of the project. ViMarket will be launching their own proprietary and secure exchange. There is no mechanism for returning funds to investors. The company does not provide any forecasts of its financial activities (estimating revenue, net income and free cash flow for future periods) The system of huge discounts (30-60%) to the base token price creates a risk of premature exit from the investment of a significant part of the investors (especially those who entered the project at the stage of open preliminary sales) and, as a result, the risk of token price collapse. Judging by the hard cap, the potential size of this ICO round seems to be too high relative to the size of comparable venture capital transactions in the early stages of project development: according to the Pitchbook report, the median size of the Round A rounds in the US venture market in the end of 2017 promises to be 6 million USD. Apparently, the project had no experience of attracting the funds of "qualified" venture investors.
The absence among the team members of a sufficient number of specialists with experience in blockchain development. Team remenuration (16% of the tokens.) should Not Be Linked to KPIs Performance. Team has been developing ViMarket since 2015, but couldn't achieve stable traction and raised venture capital for the next stage of development (Round A).
From the facts that have been shared through the company’s whitepaper and from its novel concept, this 3D asset marketplace ticks all the right boxes to become a rock-solid investment. The company’s team has done a good amount of planning and has rich experience under its belt. Further, there are no red flags as such and the entire investment plan looks so promising. Because of this, it is possibly a great idea to get some VIC tokens before the sale ends. If, however, you have a few doubts regarding how the value of this token will move in the coming time, then it makes sense to go through ViMarket’s whitepaper without wasting any more time.
Vimarket seems like a very solid investment. The company has a good planning and already has some experience. There are no visible red flags and it looks like your investment will generate profits with time. Because of this, it could be a good idea to invest in this company. If you are still unsure, be sure to read the whitepaper of the company to know more details before you invest to be sure that you are making the best possible investment before deciding how to act about the Vimarket’s ICO