SynchroLife

The market is highly competitive: more than 30 companies offer the basic function of Sinchrolife. At the same time, most competitors do not limit themselves in the comments on restaurants and several methods of monetization, which makes Sinchrolife. There are bright leaders in the market: tripadvisor (in Russia), Foursquare, yelp received more than $ 10M of investment The market estimates in wp are only indirectly relevant to the project.

The distinctive utility of the company's main value proposition for a visitor to a restaurant is questioned The usefulness of this platform for comparison with competitors is also highly questioned, due to the limitations of the audience The project budget does not go into any comparison with the budget of the market leaders (GrubHub and Just Eat the marketing budget is about 70 million euros in 2015) Large restrictions are laid in the business model Development dynamics can not be tracked using the environment or git hub) The claimed traction is not confirmed The site is not finalized The road map is as abstract as possible. The company does not provide information on how the payment of the company's expenses will be carried out at the expense of the collected funds and how the process of converting crypto currency into fiat money will be controlled, if necessary There are no mechanisms for monitoring the misuse of funds and guarantees for the investor. The mechanism for ensuring profitability for the holders of the tokens is not described Descriptions of most monetization methods are extremely abstract The Company does not provide any financial forecasts None of the monetization methods has a confirmation.

Lack of experience of CEO and unconfirmed experience of other team members.