The blockchain trilemma is a concept coined by Vitalik Buterin that proposes a set of three main issues that developers encounter when building blockchains. More often than not, creators are forced to sacrifice one ‘aspect’ for the sake of the other two. Decentralization: Rather than being managed by a single entity, blockchains distribute control over the network equally to all participants. Security: Blockchain networks should have ironclad defenses that prevent malicious entities from taking over. Scalability: Blockchains should support an enormous number of transactions and users without faltering by increasing fees and transaction times. For some in the industry, achieving all three aspects is an impossible feat that will never be done, at least in the near future. However, there are still ambitious developers who believe that blockchain networks can have all three and then some.
Ethereum is the most decentralized and secure blockchain ever, but it has become too expensive and slow. On the other hand with Binance Smart Chain, you can’t avoid obvious ‘corporate chain’ trade-offs: centralization, the shady process of validation, suspiciously low fees. Other blockchains, such as Houbi Eco Chain And Matic, are born and constantly growing to bring solutions to the problems with the two largest smart-contract-based chains. There is not a winner, each of them is valid for some reason or other, and investors move their capital by choosing the one that fits better their ideologies and needs.
But when it comes to a new project and its sale phase, the similarity of the blockchains and the single-chain limit make it limited to having to choose which chain to base its work on, giving up the benefits of a Multi Chain based sale and also limiting investment opportunities for people on other blockchains.
This offer is based solely on information provided by the offeror and other publicly available sources.
The token sale or exchange event is completely independent of ICOholder. ICOholder is not involved in any way, including technical support or promotion.
We list token sales from entities with which we have no relationship to help users track overall activity within the token sector. This information is not intended as advice, and you should seek professional or specialist guidance or conduct your own due diligence before making any decisions based on our content.
Any terms and conditions regarding token acquisition are solely between contributors and the token issuer. ICOholder is not the seller of these tokens.
ICOholder is not legally responsible for any representations made by third parties about any token sale. Any claims for breach of contract must be directed against the listed token issuing entity.
If you have concerns about the nature, legality, or propriety of a token sale or the involved individuals, please contact info@icoholder.com with detailed information.