CertiK 플랫폼은 완전히 신뢰할 수있는 스마트 연락처 및 블록 체인 생태계를 구축하기위한 공식 검증 프레임 워크로 설계되었습니다. 기존의 버그 탐지 테스트 방법과는 달리, CertiK 플랫폼은 블록 체인 생태계에 버그가 없다는 것을 수학적으로 입증하려고 시도합니다.이 재단은 다른 방법으로 금지 된 증명 작업을 모듈 식 검증 기법을 사용하여 자동으로 해결할 수있는 작은 것으로 분해합니다 분산 된 스타일. 이러한 증명 개체는 CertiK 플랫폼의 거래에서 구축되고 인코딩 될 수 있으며 다른 참가자가 검증하게됩니다.
따라서 CertiK 플랫폼의 블록 체인은 검증 된 스마트 계약서, 분산 응용 프로그램 라이브러리 (DApp) 및 블록 체인 자체의 구현의 완벽한 정확성과 보안을 입증하는 인증서로 사용됩니다.
업계에서 가장 강력한 스마트 계약 보안을위한 수동 테스트, 정적 분석 및 공식 검증을 결합하십시오.
CertiK의 공식 검증 증명 엔진과 통합하여보다 확장 가능하고 안전한 생태계를 만듭니다.
세계적 수준의 사이버 보안 전문가 팀을 활용하여 치명적인 공격 경로 및 취약점을 예방합니다.
Verified 0%
Attention. There is a risk that unverified members are not actually members of the team
Makert Competitive environment:
According to the market research by the team, smart contracts/ dApps verification market can be as large as one trillion dollars.
Direct competitors in the blockchain space:
Quantstamp - raised $31,3M, capitalization – $ 48,8M, ROI USD - 1,1x;
Zeppelin – wasn’t held, capitalization – not available.
Projects Quantstamp and Zeppelin are very human intensive and do not involve much automation, so they are far less scaleable than CertiK. Furthermore, libraries provided by OpenZeppelin are either not verified or do not offer mechanized proof objects.
Companies Solidified and Security can only be used to check/verify a list of fixed properties rather than the functional correctness.
Runtime Verification – work of this company still remains at the research stage and it is an unknown how their techniques can be applied to industry-grade systems.
The project advantages:
Strong team;
Support of large investors;
Already established strategic partnerships;
There is a video demo of the MVP;
Well-developed infrastructure;
There are only a few companies on the market, who are working in the same niche, but team points out advantages of their project over the competitors;
SOCIAL ACTIVITY
The project popularity in the social networks and discussion forums
The project is detected on the radar of the next influencers: ICO Pantera, OhHeyMatty.
Youtube: 206 subscribers, average number of views per video is 140, average number of comments under each video is 2, user activity is low.
Medium: 635 followers, the average number of likes per post is 70, without any discussion in the comment section, user activity is low.
Telegram: 39,2k members, admins on the Telegram-channel are responding quickly, user activity is high.
Advantages.
1. At least in the ico market, there are few competitors in the field of code audit. It is a blue ocean and is better than a quantstamp.
2. It is one of the few projects that Binance initially invested in. NGC also invested.
3. A strong team based on Yale and a very fast roadmap
A complementary point
1. No specific schedule or token matrix has been published yet.
2. There is a need to gather code audit groups.
cCertiK is a formal verification framework for building fully trustworthy smart contracts and blockchain ecosystems, which was founded in Silicon Valley. The platform’s aim is to help people construct bug-free and hacker-resistant smart contracts and blockchain ecosystems. CertiK’s founders are world-class formal verification experts from Yale University and Columbia University, and the senior software engineers have worked for companies such as Google, Facebook, and FreeWheel. If the team can execute their roadmap, they will be massive competition for the likes of Quantstamp and Zeppelin. Recently CertiK’s Telegram channel has also ballooned in size, and substantial interest from several cryptocurrency communities is present. We believe CertiK should have no problem reaching their hard cap and having unmet demand once the crowdsale finalzies. We believe this is a promising investment, especially for the medium-to-long run.
This offer is based solely on information provided by the offeror and other publicly available sources.
The token sale or exchange event is completely independent of ICOholder. ICOholder is not involved in any way, including technical support or promotion.
We list token sales from entities with which we have no relationship to help users track overall activity within the token sector. This information is not intended as advice, and you should seek professional or specialist guidance or conduct your own due diligence before making any decisions based on our content.
Any terms and conditions regarding token acquisition are solely between contributors and the token issuer. ICOholder is not the seller of these tokens.
ICOholder is not legally responsible for any representations made by third parties about any token sale. Any claims for breach of contract must be directed against the listed token issuing entity.
If you have concerns about the nature, legality, or propriety of a token sale or the involved individuals, please contact info@icoholder.com with detailed information.