在过去几年中见证了分散式应用的快速发展,JURA NETWORK的愿景是构建下一代区块链技术。在恶意网络活动面前,对可扩展性,最终性和可靠性的强大分散网络的要求很高。尽管近年来已经提出并改进了过多的网络,但目前的每秒事务处理(TPS),网络安全性和可扩展性的不足仍然有很大的改进空间。
考虑到这些因素,JURA团队在本文中详细介绍了由JURA NETWORK设计的JURA技术。它包括Fusus,作为分布式账本的基础的DAGlattice数据结构,在分散网络中自我调节的效用证明(PoU)共识机制,可验证随机时间(PoVRT)模块的反垃圾邮件证明,用于可伸缩性设计的分片技术,以及作为安全层的AI过滤器。 JURA团队认为,JURA将为广泛部署分散式应用铺平道路,并为当前的市场格局开辟新的改进途径。
真正分散并准备好采用业务。
- 超快
- 费用
- 自主
- 智能合约
我们技术的核心是FUSUS数据结构:基于个人帐户的DAG格式,它以不同方式优先发送和接收事务,其中每个发送事务导致将先前接收事务重新划分为单个新的创建块。这使我们能够通过定期修剪事务历史来大大提高数据查找速度和存储空间。与我们的PoVRT反垃圾邮件模块相结合,FUSUS使我们能够在效率,速度和垃圾邮件检测之间实现完美平衡。
公用事业共识机制证明。 公平分配投票权的新的,多维度,不断发展的共识机制 
2018
2019
验证 0%
注意。未经证实的成员实际上可能不是团队成员
13-July. I passed on Jura. I think it was something to do with the team. Link
We view Jura as a novel approach to the ever-growing space of infrastructure projects, hence having the potential to disrupt the market and gain a lot of usage. There is a big IF in this equation as the team has yet to prove themselves and bring forward actual progress which can validate their theories and novel technologies. There is a long road ahead and we would like to see an MVP so that the team can prove their network model and seize a place in the competitive field they are running in. They need to act fast as there are already many competitors that have working viable technologies and can bring added value to the ecosystem in the meantime.
Picolo Research presents an ‘Avoid’ rating on Jura Network. The project does not offer a unique niche that differentiates itself distinctly from other similar projects, crowning it is as yet another typical blockchain infrastructure project. Furthermore, gaining a foothold in adoption is a critical element in this competitive market, of which the project mentioned no specific business plans.
Overall, for the reasons listed below, Picolo affirms its rating on Jura:
• The project is late in entering this space, which ranks it as a lagger amongs its competitors
• No significant partnerships formed that is crucial to network adoption in this highly saturated market
• It has been more than 9 months since the inception of the project with no MVP nor GitHub code available, casting doubt on the ability to achieve their milestones
• The team is lacking the depth regarding experience in comparison to its competitors
• No public information on technology and cryptography research thesis done by the PhD members of the team prior to the project
• Currently, there is only 1 member on the advisory board with no independent advisors
• Lack of conclusiveness in the whitepaper as details are incomplete. The consensus mechanism was only partially described, and the portion to penalise dishonest behaviours have not been discussed
• High valuation of $100m is not justifiable comparative to the market cap of QLC chain (with an MVP) that currently has a market valuation of ~$18m
• More established projects have been looking to explore similar technology since 2017, but no breakthrough has yet to been developed
Not withstanding the above, Picolo acknowledges that Jura is still in its early stages and that further developments are still underway. However, given the
availability of current information presented by the company, it is difficult to disregard the concerns that have surfaced from our research.
In light of the preceding, we recommend an ‘Avoid’ rating on Jura as we believe there are significant risks associated with the project.
此优惠仅基于要约人提供的信息及其他公开信息。令牌销售或交换活动与ICO持有人完全无关,ICO持有人不参与(包括任何技术支持或促销)。仅显示ICO持有人无关的人员列出的令牌销售仅用于帮助客户跟踪总体令牌部门内发生的活动。这些信息并不意味着相当于您应该依赖的建议。在采取或不采取任何行动之前,您必须获得专业或专家的建议或进行自己的尽职调查。贡献者就收购令牌所订立的任何条款及条件属于其之间,而令牌及ICO持有人的发行人并非该等令牌的卖方。对于任何代币销售而言,ICOholder对第三方所作的任何陈述不承担任何法律责任,并且还必须直接针对此处列出的代币发行实体提出任何违反合同的请求。
如果您有任何疑问关于此令牌销售的性质,合法性或合法性或相关人员,请联系info@icoholder.com,了解有关您的疑虑的详细信息。