宝石,一个分散,开源,人性化的任务众包 协议建立在以太坊区块链之上。使用宝石 协议,任何人都可以利用可扩展微型任务的力量 工作人员无需担心任务验证,信任或 付款。宝石旨在阻止恶意行为人和 奖励公平的球员。宝石协议由一个赌注组成 确保任务完成的机制,追踪的信任机制 员工诚信,以及减少交易费用的支付系统。 创业板令牌是一种多用途令牌,为宝石提供燃料 协议。
宝石使用其令牌机制来强制所有人的行为 参与者,而不是由单一运营商进行监管。我们 进一步介绍使用Gems协议的第一个应用程序, 恰当地命名宝石平台。宝石平台连接那些谁 想要完成工作(从此以后称为“请求者”)和人类工作者 (从此以后称为“矿工”)。通过使用宝石协议, 宝石平台消除了现有的社会经济障碍 集中的替代方案(例如,大额费用,市场效率低下, 需要银行会计师等)。任何人都可以建立在 宝石平台,创建接口的“模块” 特定的人类任务。宝石团队将建立的第一个模块 专注于为AI标记数据。
宝石协议:宝石协议评估网络参与者的工作和信任的有效性; DApps将建立在Gems协议之上
Gems平台:第一个基于Gems协议的平台;将工人和请求者配对进行微观任务。
模块:在Gems平台上构建的可重用的开源任务接口
 
December 1, 2017
December 14th, 2017 — January 8th, 2018
December 14th, 2017 — January 8th, 2018
On or before January 8th, 2018
On or before January 8th, 2018
Mid January 2018
Mid January 2018
Late January-Early February 2018
Upon Completion of Token Sale
Upon Completion of Token Sale
Q1 2018
Q1 2018
验证 0%
注意。未经证实的成员实际上可能不是团队成员
Opportunities:
The project is led by a strong team who are successful entrepreneurs. The advisors are veterans in the blockchain space and can open doors for partnership with many other blockchain projects.
Micro-tasks can be performed by pretty much anyone without specialized skills. Therefore, even the unbanked in any countries can work on the Gems platform whereas they cannot become a worker on other centralized platforms because they don’t have a way to receive compensation.
The business model makes sense and can lead to substantial cost savings for requesters.
Concerns:
Even though the vast majority (75%) of the tokens are held by the team, the breakdown of those tokens are not specified. We only know that they are being used to “subsidize requesters (onboard them to the platform), encourage new workers to the platform, and will be used for long term expenditures”.
The token sales practice is questionable. There are criticisms in Gems’ use of Dutch auction for the token sale. Dutch auction by itself is not necessarily a bad token sale model.
The team has previously said that they will announce token metrics when subreddit subscribers hit 4,000 – this is gimmicky in our opinion.
In a Dutch auction, participants should only contribute when the price falls to the valuation that they believe is compelling. However, Gems encourage participants to contribute early in order to enjoy the bonus. This goes against the spirit of a Dutch auction. We believe the bonus structure should not be conditional on the timing of contribution.
The key team members of the project are working at gifs.com at the same time. It is unclear how they will allocate their time between the two ventures.
Conclusion:
Overall, we are neutral for both the short- and long-term potential this ICO. Our thoughts of the tokens for short term and long term are as follows:
For short-term holding:
Neutral. Dutch auction ensures that there will be no unmet demand for the tokens during the ICO stage. Everyone who wants to participate has a chance to do so. The bonus applied for early participation is likely going to push the valuation higher than under a normal Dutch auction.
For long-term holding:
Neutral. While we like the idea and the use of token makes sense, the starting valuation of the project is likely going to be on the high side, which substantially lowers the upside potential.
此优惠仅基于要约人提供的信息及其他公开信息。令牌销售或交换活动与ICO持有人完全无关,ICO持有人不参与(包括任何技术支持或促销)。仅显示ICO持有人无关的人员列出的令牌销售仅用于帮助客户跟踪总体令牌部门内发生的活动。这些信息并不意味着相当于您应该依赖的建议。在采取或不采取任何行动之前,您必须获得专业或专家的建议或进行自己的尽职调查。贡献者就收购令牌所订立的任何条款及条件属于其之间,而令牌及ICO持有人的发行人并非该等令牌的卖方。对于任何代币销售而言,ICOholder对第三方所作的任何陈述不承担任何法律责任,并且还必须直接针对此处列出的代币发行实体提出任何违反合同的请求。
如果您有任何疑问关于此令牌销售的性质,合法性或合法性或相关人员,请联系info@icoholder.com,了解有关您的疑虑的详细信息。