FIRST FAIR

FIRST FAIR

Created using Figma
First Fair는 모든 투자자는 공정하게 대우되어야하며 투자자는 교환 / 중개인과는 반대로 투자에서 실제로 이익을 얻는 사람이어야한다고 믿습니다. 우리는 ICO를 통해이 비전을 실현하고자합니다. 따라서 ICO에 투자하여 미래의 투자를보다 효과적으로 할 수 있기를 바랍니다.
2018. 5. 16.
2018. 5. 30.
100% 완료된
기금 모금 - 데이터 없음
past

약 FIRST FAIR

Throughout the past and present, exchanges have not been “all-in-one”, offering usually only one type of asset (e.g. cryptocurrency). On the other hand, brokers of CFDs (contracts for difference) offer a very limited number of cryptocurrencies typically with expiry dates, as they make too many losses for them to have fair trading conditions for cryptocurrencies and implement a larger amount of available assets. This is a problem for a lot of investors. They need to decide between a large variety of assets with unfair trading conditions, and between a limited amount of assets with more fair-trading conditions. If you traded cryptocurrency in November-December 2017 on a CFD/futures platform, you may remember brokers put extremely small order size limits and position/asset expiry dates just because many people were profiting, and the brokers were losing money from the many people profiting, proving how greedy and unethical CFD/future brokers can be. Along with these issues, many brokers and exchanges are not really open to feedback. They may consider suggestions if a lot of people vote to have it implemented, but not if one or just a few people request X feedback, even when X feedback is very rational. There’s also the issue of exchanges/brokers having many different fees implemented, making it hard for investors/traders to understand which fees will be applicable to them. This can be a nuisance, as it means investors may be hit with unexpected fees, as fees are not clearly stated. This could lead to financial loss, and consequently complaints, which companies often seem very one-sided and narrow-minded about to ensure they make as much profit as possible. Exchanges/brokers may not even bother replying to their customers about their issues, reply very late (e.g. after a fortnight), or reply with generic, unhelpful messages. This can evidently cause stress towards investors/traders, as this can potentially lead to tremendous financial losses. That’s another issue: transparency and ethicality. Exchanges and brokers are often not transparent with their community about how they operate and do a lot of things unexpectedly and/or in secret. This is unethical towards investors and traders, as they are the ones leading to losses from the exchanges/brokers treating them unfairly. Also, many brokers/exchanges do not offer multilingual language options or customer support, making it very hard of speakers of “unsupported” languages to communicate with customer support or make use of the website. Finally, while some brokers/exchanges admittedly have excellent security features, they all lack one thing or another. Some lack 2 factor auth, some lack “emergency” account support for account issues, some lack appropriate e-mail alerts for login attempts, and much more. While some brokers/exchanges do not have some of these issues, we aren’t aware of any that have fully fixed all of these issues and made the trading experience 100% fair and ethical for the investors/traders using their platforms.

  • 정보 업데이트에는 시간차가있을 수 있으므로 각 ICO 프로젝트에 대한 정확한 정보는 공식 웹 사이트 또는 기타 커뮤니케이션 채널을 통해 확인해야합니다.
  • 이 정보는 ICO 기금 투자에 대한 제안이나 조언이 아닙니다. 관련 정보를 철저히 조사하고 ICO 참여를 결정하십시오.
  • 이 콘텐츠에 대해 수정해야 할 문제 또는 문제가 있다고 생각되거나 자신의 ICO 프로젝트를 제출하고자 할 경우 이메일을 보내주십시오. a>
면책 조항 및 위험 경고를 읽으십시오. 면책 조항 및 위험 경고 표시.