Reasons Why We Cannot Have A PPE Curriculum Without the Digital Currency Bitcoin: Explained?
Bitcoin is unquestionably a social phenomenon that should be investigated further as a good philosophy, politics, and economics degree program. After World War I, the aristocratic elite at the University of Oxford felt that students who wanted to join public service required a more contemporary education to prepare them for life in the post-war world. To comprehend social phenomena and rule successfully, they said that you needed a thorough command of philosophy, ethics and logic, politics, and the history of politics, as well as an in-depth understanding of economics. Before we move on any further in our guide, we were hoping you could sign up yourself on crypto trader and join the bitcoin era community to do well in the bitcoin trading game.
To comprehend complex social processes, you must have a comprehensive knowledge base. Before diving into the personal protective equipment (PPE) of the exponential technology known as Bitcoin, let’s briefly establish what “social phenomena” are and whether Bitcoin falls into this category.
What Do You Mean By “Social Phenomena”?
According to a comprehensive definition, “social phenomena” are “events, trends, or responses that take place inside an established human society… indicated by collective alterations of behavior” — which might theoretically refer to anything at all. Indeed, your economics and politics are almost inseparable from your philosophy and politics. As a result of this definition and the above examples, it is reasonable to describe the creation of Bitcoin as an event that resulted in “collective modifications of behavior” that has unruly underlying principles and is frequently referred to as a religion — whether in a proud enrollment or a scathing criticism.
The Philosophy of Bitcoin
There is no lack of Bitcoin philosophers, and you could easily spend hundreds of hours learning about and listening to the many schools of philosophical thinking that are now available on the internet. Several intelligent components are universal, and many of the references in Bitcoin’s foundation paper, which is as follows:
- Voluntary options are usually preferable to mandated approaches, and Bitcoin is a voluntary approach.
- Bitcoin is open and transparent to the greatest extent possible, allowing the most significant number of eyes to be on the code and share ideas. What kind of singular entity could ever compete with something like this?
- Bitcoin is an entirely acceptable currency. It cannot generate out of thin air, nor can it be taken away or redistributed by force. To get bitcoin, you must put in the necessary effort.
- It may be accomplished by a peer-to-peer system that timestamps events by hashing data into a part of providing authenticated hash-based proof of work, which is the most efficient method of achieving this goal today.
- The ability for everyone in the world to effortlessly hold a copy of Bitcoin at home is essential for everyone to have the chance to become a fully autonomous Bitcoin citizen.
- It is not necessary to take your bitcoin back from anyone if you do not willingly give up control of your private keys in the future. You will almost certainly get a religious thrill down your spine when you comprehend the significance of the seizure’s impossibility in a religious context.
Politics of Bitcoin (Governance)
According to a cynic, politics are the activities of attaining and retaining power, while governance is the work done by individuals in positions of authority. Thus, Bitcoin is no “political process” in Bitcoin; instead, decentralized, voluntary donations win based on their technological merits, which is what it designs to become. As a result of this, the prehend of Bitcoin is very clearly defined; I would highly recommend reading both of these articles for thorough learning on the subject. The following is a summary of the previously mentioned works:
The Participants in The Bitcoin Politics
According to the data, when it comes to Bitcoin’s governance, the “users” and miners are the ones that have real political power. The word “user” may be used to refer to a variety of people. It is not enough to have bitcoins considered a “user” or influence the Bitcoin governance system. The miners are responsible for creating blocks following the rules of the Bitcoin protocol, and any proposed protocol modifications must be supported by more than 90 percent of the miners before they can implement.